[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

BCP38 dismissal

Subject: BCP38 dismissal
From: jrhett at netconsonance.com (Jo Rhett)
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 09:45:15 -0700
In-reply-to: <00d501c90e99$ffb4e480$ff1ead80$@com>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <00d501c90e99$ffb4e480$ff1ead80$@com>

On Sep 4, 2008, at 7:24 AM, James Jun wrote:
> Indeed... In today's internet, protecting your own box (cp-policer/ 
> control
> plane filtering) is far more important IMO than implementing BCP38  
> when much
> of attack traffic comes from legitimate IP sources anyway (see  
> botnets).

I'm sorry, but nonsense statements such as these burn the blood.   
Sure, yes, protecting yourself is so much more important than  
protecting anyone else.

Anyone else want to stand up and join the "I am an asshole" club?

-- 
Jo Rhett
Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source  
and other randomness

Follow-Ups:
- BCP38 dismissal
  - From: bambenek at gmail.com (John C. A. Bambenek)
- BCP38 dismissal
  - From: james at towardex.com (James Jun)
- BCP38 dismissal
  - From: pauldotwall at gmail.com (Paul Wall)
- BCP38 dismissal
  - From: ge at linuxbox.org (Gadi Evron)
- BCP38 dismissal
  - From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)

References:
- Force10 Gear - Opinions
  - From: jrhett at netconsonance.com (Jo Rhett)
- Force10 Gear - Opinions
  - From: pauldotwall at gmail.com (Paul Wall)
- Force10 Gear - Opinions
  - From: james at towardex.com (James Jun)

Prev by Date: uRPF
Next by Date: BCP38 dismissal
Previous by thread: Force10 Gear - Opinions
Next by thread: BCP38 dismissal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread