[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Speed Testing and Throughput testing

Subject: Speed Testing and Throughput testing
From: jason at biel-tech.com (Jason Biel)
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 08:07:49 -0600
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <41D9DD0F7396FC4CBAC6760948AE02AC011A63EADE@angelina> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

We actually used both tests to finally narrow down the TCP window size
issue.  We first used the UDP test to make sure the link was good.

Jason

On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 10:54 PM, Simon Horman <horms at verge.net.au> wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 06:49:05AM -0600, Jason Biel wrote:
> > Linux always worked best for us as well, was easy running a livecd with
> > laptops.  We found that two windows XP machines, same identical hardware
> and
> > OS load yielded different registry settings (or lack thereof) for TCP
> Window
> > setting.
>
> I would have thought that (netperf's) UDP tests were more appropriate
> than TCP for testing link speed. Am I missing the point?
>
>

-- 
Jason Biel

References:
- Speed Testing and Throughput testing
  - From: mark.urbach at pnpt.com (Mark Urbach)
- Speed Testing and Throughput testing
  - From: benoit.vannier at apog.net (Benoit VANNIER)
- Speed Testing and Throughput testing
  - From: jason at biel-tech.com (Jason Biel)
- Speed Testing and Throughput testing
  - From: bclark at spectraaccess.com (Bret Clark)
- Speed Testing and Throughput testing
  - From: jason at biel-tech.com (Jason Biel)
- Speed Testing and Throughput testing
  - From: horms at verge.net.au (Simon Horman)

Prev by Date: HE.net, Fremont-2 outage?
Next by Date: Human Factors and Accident reduction/mitigation
Previous by thread: Speed Testing and Throughput testing
Next by thread: Speed Testing and Throughput testing
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread