[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
OT: VSS + MEC - port-channel dynamically cloned?
- Subject: OT: VSS + MEC - port-channel dynamically cloned?
- From: ross at kallisti.us (Ross Vandegrift)
- Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:54:52 -0500
- In-reply-to: <1259097573.5897.2.camel@leland-laptop>
- References: <1259045489.12138.5.camel@leland-gandi> <[email protected]> <1259097573.5897.2.camel@leland-laptop>
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:19:33PM +0100, Leland Vandervort wrote:
> In this case, though I cannot see where the mismatch is given that the
> encapsulation, trunking (vlans allowed, etc.) and channel mode (LACP)
> are all configured identically across all ports and the channel itself.
>
> Just wondering if it's a left-over from before the VSS migration when
> the original trunks were two separate etherchannels and then migrated
> them "live" to MEC...
Check flow control between all of the elements. The only time I've
seen this was inconsistent flow control settings between different
media types on an F5 BIG-IP <-> 6500 bundle.
show interfaces flowcontrol
Ross
--
Ross Vandegrift
ross at kallisti.us
"If the fight gets hot, the songs get hotter. If the going gets tough,
the songs get tougher."
--Woody Guthrie
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20091124/5ac454fd/attachment.bin>