Using /126 for IPv6 router links

[nanog at 85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc.nosense.org (Mark Smith)]

On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 23:04:26 +0000
"Dobbins, Roland" <rdobbins at arbor.net> wrote:

> 
> On Jan 24, 2010, at 4:43 AM, Mark Smith wrote:
> 
> > That's a new bit of FUD. References?
> 
> It isn't 'FUD'.
> 
> redistribute connected.
> 

In my opinion it's better not to do blind redistribution. More control
means less things that are unexpected or or can be forgotten.

That being said, I don't understand why that's a problem, and why that
problem doesn't already exist in IPv4. 

> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Roland Dobbins <rdobbins at arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>
> 
>     Injustice is relatively easy to bear; what stings is justice.
> 
>                         -- H.L. Mencken
> 
> 
> 
>