[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RINA - scott whaps at the nanog hornets nest :-)

Subject: RINA - scott whaps at the nanog hornets nest :-)
From: jbates at brightok.net (Jack Bates)
Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 17:05:00 -0500
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]><[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On 11/6/2010 4:52 PM, George Bonser wrote:
>
> That is also somewhat mitigated in that it operates in two modes.  The
> first mode is what I would call "passive" mode and only comes into play
> once a black hole is detected.  It does not change the operation of TCP
> until a packet disappears.  The second method is the "active" mode where
> it actively probes with increasing packet sizes until it hits a black
> hole or gets an ICMP response.
>
>
While it reads well, what implementations are actually in use? As with 
most protocols, it is useless if it doesn't have a high penetration.

Jack

Follow-Ups:
- RINA - scott whaps at the nanog hornets nest :-)
  - From: gbonser at seven.com (George Bonser)

References:
- RINA - scott whaps at the nanog hornets nest :-)
  - From: gbonser at seven.com (George Bonser)
- RINA - scott whaps at the nanog hornets nest :-)
  - From: ras at e-gerbil.net (Richard A Steenbergen)
- RINA - scott whaps at the nanog hornets nest :-)
  - From: gbonser at seven.com (George Bonser)
- RINA - scott whaps at the nanog hornets nest :-)
  - From: sthaug at nethelp.no (sthaug at nethelp.no)
- RINA - scott whaps at the nanog hornets nest :-)
  - From: jbates at brightok.net (Jack Bates)
- RINA - scott whaps at the nanog hornets nest :-)
  - From: gbonser at seven.com (George Bonser)

Prev by Date: RINA - scott whaps at the nanog hornets nest :-)
Next by Date: RINA - scott whaps at the nanog hornets nest :-)
Previous by thread: RINA - scott whaps at the nanog hornets nest :-)
Next by thread: RINA - scott whaps at the nanog hornets nest :-)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread