[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
IPv6
- Subject: IPv6
- From: sthaug at nethelp.no (sthaug at nethelp.no)
- Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 13:09:55 +0100 (CET)
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <732392d9$bdf3fc5$7a7b0ede$@com> <[email protected]>
> > That's what I'm hearing. Cogent refuses to peer with HE via IPv6.
> > So cogent IPv6 Customers currently can not hit things at HE. And they can't
> > do anything about it. Besides 6to4 tunneling and BGP peering with HE (or
> > native, If they can).
>
> A few weeks ago I compared what cogent sees compared to a tata+highwinds feed.
>
> http://blog.snijders-it.nl/2010/10/cogent-as174-does-not-have-full-ipv6.html
>
> They are missing roughly 1000 prefixes.
As long as we are in public "naming and shaming" mode, it should be noted
that Cogent is not alone. We have an IPv4/IPv6 transit from Level3, and
they don't have the HE prefixes either.
Our two other IPv4/IPv6 transits seem to have no problem supplying us with
a full IPv6 routing table.
Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug at nethelp.no
- References:
- IPv6
- From: nick at flhsi.com (Nick Olsen)
- IPv6
- From: job at instituut.net (Job W. J. Snijders)