[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you?

Subject: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you?
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 21:52:51 -0500
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 11 Jan 2011 01:17:39 GMT." <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Tue, 11 Jan 2011 01:17:39 GMT, lorddoskias said:

> appropriate treatment in case of emergency. With bigger company this 
> would be harder, though I think the position "account manager" is 
> essential this

Heard someplace, but we've been here ourselves:

"We were thrilled to hear they were assigning us our very own lead account
manager, until we found out the other levels were platinum, gold, silver, and
bronze..."

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 227 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20110110/6b6644b1/attachment.bin>

References:
- Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you?
  - From: rcarpen at network1.net (Randy Carpenter)
- Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you?
  - From: Greg.Whynott at oicr.on.ca (Greg Whynott)
- Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you?
  - From: khomyakov.andrey at gmail.com (Andrey Khomyakov)
- Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you?
  - From: brandon.kim at brandontek.com (Brandon Kim)
- Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you?
  - From: Greg.Whynott at oicr.on.ca (Greg Whynott)
- Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you?
  - From: jeff-kell at utc.edu (Jeff Kell)
- Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you?
  - From: lorddoskias at gmail.com (lorddoskias)

Prev by Date: Cruzio peering
Next by Date: Cruzio peering
Previous by thread: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you?
Next by thread: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread