[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?

Subject: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?
From: mikevs at xs4all.net (Miquel van Smoorenburg)
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 21:37:47 +0100
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

In article <xs4all.4D2E0B77.9060504 at ispalliance.net>,
Scott Helms  <khelms at ispalliance.net> wrote:
>Few home users have a stateful firewall configured and AFAIK none of the 
>consumer models come with a good default set of rules much less a drop 
>all unknown.

The v6 capable CPEs for home users I've seen so far all include
stateful firewalling with inbound default deny.

(including the one I'm using right now)

Is your experience with such CPEs any different ?

Mike.

Follow-Ups:
- Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?
  - From: khelms at ispalliance.net (Scott Helms)

References:
- Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?
  - From: tariq198487 at hotmail.com (Tarig Ahmed)
- Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?
  - From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)
- Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?
  - From: fergdawgster at gmail.com (Paul Ferguson)
- Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?
  - From: khelms at ispalliance.net (Scott Helms)

Prev by Date: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?
Next by Date: TeliaSonera US contact?
Previous by thread: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?
Next by thread: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread