[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?

Subject: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:16:44 -0500
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:13:43 EST." <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:13:43 EST, Scott Helms said:
> Few home users have a stateful firewall configured

What percent of home users are running a Windows older than XP SP2?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 227 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20110112/981a289f/attachment.bin>

Follow-Ups:
- Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?
  - From: fergdawgster at gmail.com (Paul Ferguson)

References:
- Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?
  - From: tariq198487 at hotmail.com (Tarig Ahmed)
- Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?
  - From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)
- Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?
  - From: fergdawgster at gmail.com (Paul Ferguson)
- Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?
  - From: khelms at ispalliance.net (Scott Helms)

Prev by Date: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?
Next by Date: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?
Previous by thread: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?
Next by thread: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread