[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?

Subject: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:18:17 -0500
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 12 Jan 2011 11:21:24 PST." <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 11:21:24 PST, Paul Ferguson said:

> Try this at home, with/without NAT:
> 
> 1. Buy a new PC with Windows installed
> 2. Install all security patches needed since the OS was installed
> 
> Without NAT, you're unpatched PC will get infected in less than 1 minute.

What release of Windows?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 227 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20110112/0020714b/attachment.bin>

Follow-Ups:
- Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?
  - From: fergdawgster at gmail.com (Paul Ferguson)

References:
- Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?
  - From: tariq198487 at hotmail.com (Tarig Ahmed)
- Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?
  - From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)
- Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?
  - From: fergdawgster at gmail.com (Paul Ferguson)

Prev by Date: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?
Next by Date: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?
Previous by thread: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?
Next by thread: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread