[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Network Naming
- Subject: Network Naming
- From: gary.steers at sharedband.com (Gary Steers)
- Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 01:15:18 -0000
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <7aeb7ba0$10caab2c$7a5700bb$@com> <[email protected]>
James makes a good point...
> Pick a scheme which:
> 1. Uses simple memorable names.
> 2. Makes business sense to you.
> 3. You know how to manage (database, publication, updates, etc.
> If I had to weight these criteria, I would weight 3 most heavily.
The other key thing to bear in mind is consistency and scalability... (i.e. design a scope that can grow with your network and needs
{interface/server}.{router/vmhost}.{city}.{country}.example.net
The other thing that doesn't really have any defined list is {city}, Some people prefer 2 letter, some 3 letter, some people use airport codes etc..
Hope that helps!
G
---
Gary Steers
Sharedband NOC/3rd Line Support
Sharedband
UK: +44 (0)1473 287207
US: +1 206 420 0240
E: gary.steers at sharedband.com
We have a?new support system - http://support.sharedband.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Cutler James R [mailto:james.cutler at consultant.com]
Sent: 25 January 2011 22:41
To: nanog group
Subject: Re: Network Naming
On Jan 25, 2011, at 3:50 PM, Nick Olsen wrote:
> Whats the rule of thumb for naming gear these days
> (routers,switches...etc). Or is there one?
Pick a scheme which:
1. Uses simple memorable names.
2. Makes business sense to you.
3. You know how to manage (database, publication, updates, etc.
If I had to weight these criteria, I would weight 3 most heavily.
James R. Cutler
james.cutler at consultant.com