[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

IPv6: numbering of point-to-point-links

Subject: IPv6: numbering of point-to-point-links
From: ml at kenweb.org (ML)
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 09:07:05 -0500
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <FC64B3384195884588D252343702D23F01854588@ICABEXCCLU01B.int.sonofon.dk> <[email protected]>

On 1/24/2011 4:20 PM, Ray Soucy wrote:

> That said.  By not using the 64-bit boundary you may be sacrificing
> performance optimizations with today's processors that lack operations
> for values larger than 64-bits.


Is this an issue for any known vendors today?

References:
- IPv6: numbering of point-to-point-links
  - From: laja at telenor.dk (Lasse Jarlskov)
- IPv6: numbering of point-to-point-links
  - From: rps at maine.edu (Ray Soucy)

Prev by Date: PPPOE vs DHCP
Next by Date: PPPOE vs DHCP
Previous by thread: IPv6: numbering of point-to-point-links
Next by thread: IPv6: numbering of point-to-point-links
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread