[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Ipv6 for the content provider

Subject: Ipv6 for the content provider
From: david.freedman at uk.clara.net (David Freedman)
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 19:10:58 +0000
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

>>
>>
> And if your servers behind the LB aren't prepared for it, you lose a LOT
> of logging data, geolocation capabilities, and some other things if you
> go that route.
>
> Owen
>
>
>

I can't imagine an LB vendor who would sell a v6 to v4 vip solution who
wouldn't provide a way to inject the v6 addr in to the request as an
additional header? I suggest a naming-and-shaming is in order


-- 


David Freedman
Group Network Engineering
Claranet Group

Follow-Ups:
- Ipv6 for the content provider
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)

References:
- Ipv6 for the content provider
  - From: charles at knownelement.com (Charles N Wyble)
- Ipv6 for the content provider
  - From: gbonser at seven.com (George Bonser)
- Ipv6 for the content provider
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)

Prev by Date: Ipv6 for the content provider
Next by Date: Ipv6 for the content provider
Previous by thread: Ipv6 for the content provider
Next by thread: Ipv6 for the content provider
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread