[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Another v6 question

Subject: Another v6 question
From: swmike at swm.pp.se (Mikael Abrahamsson)
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 20:32:12 +0100 (CET)
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Jared Mauch wrote:

> The ipv6 zealots talking about anything but a /64 for end-site are 
> talking about a "business class" service.  Even with my static IPs at 
> home, I have no need for more than a single /64 to be used in my wildest 
> dreams.  I could live with ~256 ips for the future.  I consider my tech 
> density "above-average".

I don't agree at all. I have 3 /64s in use in my home already. I could 
fairly easily go down to 2, but I definitely need at least 2.

I don't want to handle people like me differently, thus /56 for all 
residential customers makes a lot of sense. I see no downside.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike at swm.pp.se

Follow-Ups:
- Another v6 question
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)

References:
- Another v6 question
  - From: nmaxpierson at gmail.com (Max Pierson)
- Another v6 question
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- Another v6 question
  - From: nmaxpierson at gmail.com (Max Pierson)
- Another v6 question
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- Another v6 question
  - From: nmaxpierson at gmail.com (Max Pierson)
- Another v6 question
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- Another v6 question
  - From: jared at puck.nether.net (Jared Mauch)

Prev by Date: Found: Who is responsible for no more IP addresses
Next by Date: Found: Who is responsible for no more IP addresses
Previous by thread: Another v6 question
Next by thread: Another v6 question
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread