[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Another v6 question

Subject: Another v6 question
From: jbates at brightok.net (Jack Bates)
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 19:08:55 -0600
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On 1/27/2011 7:03 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote:
> Security and logical division are a few ideas.
> You might not care to do that now...  but in 20 years,  when you have
> 100000  smart chip / IP-based home automation enabled devices on your
> LAN.

My helpdesk decided to counter with "We'll run out because of the 
nanobots we'll be injected with to cure cancer and other diseases." They 
just don't understand the fact that a single /64 network is plenty to 
handle all the nanobots in the human body (supposing we're still going 
to be human). Of course, the nanobots really do need their own isolated 
subnet. They do a lot of multicast, I'm guessing.

Jack

References:
- Another v6 question
  - From: nmaxpierson at gmail.com (Max Pierson)
- Another v6 question
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- Another v6 question
  - From: nmaxpierson at gmail.com (Max Pierson)
- Another v6 question
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- Another v6 question
  - From: nmaxpierson at gmail.com (Max Pierson)
- Another v6 question
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- Another v6 question
  - From: jared at puck.nether.net (Jared Mauch)
- Another v6 question
  - From: mysidia at gmail.com (Jimmy Hess)

Prev by Date: Another v6 question
Next by Date: Connectivity status for Egypt
Previous by thread: Another v6 question
Next by thread: Another v6 question
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread