[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Level 3's IRR Database

Subject: Level 3's IRR Database
From: nick at foobar.org (Nick Hilliard)
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 20:47:06 +0000
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On 30/01/2011 17:39, Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo wrote:
> The solution to this problem (theoretical at least) already exist in
> the form of RPKI.

So, what are peoples' routing policies on RPKI going to be?  Are people 
going to drop prefixes with no RPKI record?  Or drop prefixes with an 
incorrect RPKI record?  Or drop prefixes with a revoked status?

I'm concerned that if we're trying to avoid another Youtube affair, the 
RPKI policy acceptability criteria will have to be so strict that this may 
have a serious effect on overall reachability via the internet.

Nick

Follow-Ups:
- Level 3's IRR Database
  - From: carlosm3011 at gmail.com (Carlos M. Martinez)
- Level 3's IRR Database
  - From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
- Level 3's IRR Database
  - From: jbates at brightok.net (Jack Bates)

References:
- Level 3's IRR Database
  - From: aa at tenet.ac.za (Andrew Alston)
- Level 3's IRR Database
  - From: carlosm3011 at gmail.com (Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo)

Prev by Date: A top-down RPKI model a threat to human freedom? (was Re: Level 3's IRR Database)
Next by Date: EPC backhaul networks
Previous by thread: Level 3's IRR Database
Next by thread: Level 3's IRR Database
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread