[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN
> At AMSIX, a Cisco 12000 running IOS will get into trouble with the 170pps of
> ND seen there. AMSIX doesn't do MLD snooping so everybody gets everything
> and on IOS 12000 ND is punted to RP and when it's busy with calculating BGP,
> it'll start dropping BGP sessions.
Really? I've tried to duplicate the results in our lab, but I can't
provoke any problems at those numbers. Is it the "other" multicast
traffic that's interfering with ND?
When pounding the CPU with ~30 times more (5000pps) Neighbour
solicitations and flapping 1000 BGP IPv4 prefixes (out of 51000) every
5 seconds, I get the following load (worst case):
12k#sh proc cpu | ex 0.00
CPU utilization for five seconds: 99%/13%; one minute: 83%; five minutes: 76%
PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process
29 19472 7944653 2 0.31% 0.07% 0.05% 0 PowerMgr Main
160 5120 3415 1499 0.47% 0.18% 0.06% 0 Exec
181 17016 76522129 0 0.07% 0.14% 0.15% 0 CEF RP IPC Backg
185 1992892 19727573 101 17.91% 19.36% 20.02% 0 IPv6 Input
213 256008 9155905 27 3.03% 2.80% 2.83% 0 BGP Router
216 3606044 677600 5321 64.31% 45.74% 37.41% 0 BGP Scanner
12k#
Even though the load is high, there is no flaps, neither in ISIS, LDP,
BFD (3 sessions with 3 x 50 ms asynch mode) nor BGP.
When BGP Scanner is not running, the numbers are much lower:
martin#sh proc cpu | ex 0.00
CPU utilization for five seconds: 45%/16%; one minute: 82%; five minutes: 76%
PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process
160 5192 3454 1503 0.79% 0.20% 0.08% 0 Exec
181 17068 76522593 0 0.15% 0.15% 0.15% 0 CEF RP IPC Backg
185 2000528 19764701 101 24.79% 19.70% 20.01% 0 IPv6 Input
213 256976 9156110 28 3.03% 2.82% 2.83% 0 BGP Router
martin#
The hardware in question is a PRP-1 running SY9b, and the same LC
(SIP-601/SPA-5x1GE-v2) is used for both ND and BGP.
Note: When doing 10000pps ND, the LDP-adjacency with a neighbour on
the same LC did flap occasionally.
--
Pelle
RFC1925, truth 11:
?Every old idea will be proposed again with a different name and
?a different presentation, regardless of whether it works.