[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
quietly....
Has there been any discussion about allocating the Class E blocks? If this
doesn't count as "future use" what does? (Yes, I realize this doesn't *fix*
the problem here)
-Jeremy
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:15 PM, Jack Carrozzo <jack at crepinc.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 9:55 PM, Jimmy Hess <mysidia at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > IPv4's not dead yet; even the first RIR exhaustion probable in 3 -
> > 6 months doesn't end the IPv4 ride.
> >
> > There is some hope more IPv4 organizations will start thinking about
> > their plans for establishing connectivity with IPv6; so they can
> > commmunicate with IPv6-only hosts that will begin to emerge
> > later.
> >
>
> What organizations (eye networks) will do is layer NAT till the cows come
> home for some years to come. Buckle up!
>
> -Jack Carrozzo
>
- Follow-Ups:
- quietly....
- From: streiner at cluebyfour.org (Justin M. Streiner)
- quietly....
- From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- quietly....
- From: millnert at gmail.com (Martin Millnert)
- quietly....
- From: nanog-post at rsuc.gweep.net (Joe Provo)
- References:
- quietly....
- From: bmanning at isi.edu (bill manning)
- quietly....
- From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
- quietly....
- From: carlosm3011 at gmail.com (Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo)
- quietly....
- From: mysidia at gmail.com (Jimmy Hess)
- quietly....
- From: jack at crepinc.com (Jack Carrozzo)