Microsoft's participation in World IPv6 day

[cb.list6 at gmail.com (Cameron Byrne)]

On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 5:47 AM, Cameron Byrne <cb.list6 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:09 AM, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Jun 7, 2011, at 9:59 PM, Martin Millnert wrote:
>>
>>> Owen,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:47 PM, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
>>>> LSN is required when access providers come across the following two
>>>> combined constraints:
>>>>
>>>> ? ? ? ?1. ? ? ?No more IPv4 addresses to give to customers.
>>>> ? ? ? ?2. ? ? ?No ability to deploy those customers on IPv6.
>>>
>>> 2 has little bearing on need of LSN to access v4. ?Insufficient amount
>>> of IPv4 addresses => LSN required.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Martin
>>
>> No, if you have the option of deploying the customers on IPv6, you don't
>> need LSN.
>>
>> The problem is that until the vast majority of content is dual-stack, you can't
>> deploy customers on IPv6 without IPv4.
>>
>>
>
> cough cough NAT64/DNS64 ...
>

cough DS-lite.

Cameron

> Cameron
>
>> Owen
>>
>>
>>
>