[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses

Subject: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses
From: patrick at ianai.net (Patrick W. Gilmore)
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:54:11 -0400
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>

On Jun 15, 2011, at 12:47 PM, James Grace wrote:

> So we're running out of peering space in our /24 and we were considering using private /30's for new peerings.  Are there any horrific consequences to picking up this practice?

"Horrific"?  How about: "Most peers won't bring up a session."

What happens if the peer is using 1918 space internally?

-- 
TTFN,
patrick

Follow-Ups:
- Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses
  - From: isabeldias1 at yahoo.com (isabel dias)

References:
- Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses
  - From: james at cs.fiu.edu (James Grace)

Prev by Date: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses
Next by Date: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses
Previous by thread: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses
Next by thread: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread