[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs

Subject: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
From: drc at virtualized.org (David Conrad)
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 08:59:13 -1000
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <m2fwn5ptz3.wl%[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Jun 19, 2011, at 8:49 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> said:
>>> Now I'm tempted to be the guy that gets .mail
>> express that temptation in dollars, and well into two commas.
> Imagine the "typo-squating" someone could do with .con.

See section 2.2.1.1 (and section 2.1.2) of http://www.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/rfp-clean-30may11-en.pdf

Regards,
-drc

Follow-Ups:
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)

References:
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
  - From: johnl at iecc.com (John Levine)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
  - From: jra at baylink.com (Jay Ashworth)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
  - From: ikiris at gmail.com (Blake Dunlap)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
  - From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
  - From: cmadams at hiwaay.net (Chris Adams)

Prev by Date: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
Next by Date: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
Previous by thread: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
Next by thread: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread