[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs

Subject: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
From: richard.barnes at gmail.com (Richard Barnes)
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 15:27:18 -0400
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <m2fwn5ptz3.wl%[email protected]> <[email protected]>

The same type that Colombia/NeuStar is doing with .co?


On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Chris Adams <cmadams at hiwaay.net> wrote:
> Once upon a time, Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> said:
>> > Now I'm tempted to be the guy that gets .mail
>>
>> express that temptation in dollars, and well into two commas.
>
> Imagine the "typo-squating" someone could do with .con.
> --
> Chris Adams <cmadams at hiwaay.net>
> Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
> I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
>
>

References:
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
  - From: johnl at iecc.com (John Levine)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
  - From: jra at baylink.com (Jay Ashworth)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
  - From: ikiris at gmail.com (Blake Dunlap)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
  - From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
  - From: cmadams at hiwaay.net (Chris Adams)

Prev by Date: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
Next by Date: Cogent depeers ESnet
Previous by thread: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
Next by thread: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread