unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs

Subject: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
From: drc at virtualized.org (David Conrad)
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 16:04:09 -1000
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Jun 19, 2011, at 3:24 PM, Paul Vixie wrote:
> i think we have to just discourage lookups of single-token names, universally.

How?

Regards,
-drc

Follow-Ups:
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
  - From: vixie at isc.org (Paul Vixie)

References:
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
  - From: johnl at iecc.com (John Levine)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
  - From: jra at baylink.com (Jay Ashworth)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
  - From: ikiris at gmail.com (Blake Dunlap)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
  - From: ghira at mistral.co.uk (Adam Atkinson)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
  - From: vixie at isc.org (Paul Vixie)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
  - From: marka at isc.org (Mark Andrews)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
  - From: jbaino at gmail.com (Jeremy)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
  - From: vixie at isc.org (Paul Vixie)