[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Interested in input on tunnels as an IPv6 transition technology
- Subject: Interested in input on tunnels as an IPv6 transition technology
- From: cb.list6 at gmail.com (Cameron Byrne)
- Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 11:03:17 -0700
- In-reply-to: <1305265953.18376.1032.camel@karl>
- References: <1305265953.18376.1032.camel@karl>
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Karl Auer <kauer at biplane.com.au> wrote:
> Hullo all.
>
> I'm working on a talk, and would be interested to know what people think
> is good about tunnels as an IPv6 transition technology, and what people
> think is bad about tunnels.
>
> It would probably be best to let me know off-list :-) but I'm happy to
> summarise back to the list. Any references you have to useful papers,
> articles, discussions etc would also be appreciated.
>
> I'm looking for both general problems and advantages, but also
> advantages and disadvantages specific to particular tunnel types. It
> would also be helpful to know from what perspective particular things
> are good or bad, in so far as it isn't obvious. A carrier has a
> different perspective than, say, a home user, who will have a different
> perspective again to an enterprise user.
>
> Many thanks in advance for your input.
http://labs.ripe.net/Members/emileaben/6to4-why-is-it-so-bad
http://labs.ripe.net/Members/gih/testing-teredo