[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space)

Subject: Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space)
From: drc at virtualized.org (David Conrad)
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 17:23:10 -1000
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On May 26, 2011, at 5:14 PM, Wil Schultz wrote:
> > Out of curiosity, is there an IPv6 stack for ham devices?
> Well there's a loaded question.
...
> I won't say that there aren't "ham devices" with an IP stack built in, but I think we're talking about different layers here.

Sorry, poorly worded.  What I was wondering is there is an equivalent of KA9Q for IPv6.  I believe one of the comments we got back when we were trying to reclaim 44/8 was that folks couldn't migrate to IPv6 because no software was available...

Regards,
-drc

Follow-Ups:
- Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space)
  - From: lyndon at orthanc.ca (Lyndon Nerenberg)
- Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space)
  - From: william.allen.simpson at gmail.com (William Allen Simpson)
- Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space)
  - From: simon.leinen at switch.ch (Simon Leinen)

References:
- Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space)
  - From: cjp at 0x1.net (Christopher Pilkington)
- Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space)
  - From: jack at crepinc.com (Jack Carrozzo)
- Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space)
  - From: cjp at 0x1.net (Christopher Pilkington)
- Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space)
  - From: jack at crepinc.com (Jack Carrozzo)
- Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space)
  - From: crosevear at skytap.com (Carl Rosevear)
- Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space)
  - From: drc at virtualized.org (David Conrad)
- Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space)
  - From: jack at crepinc.com (Jack Carrozzo)
- Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space)
  - From: jaime at sensoryresearch.net (Jaime Magiera)
- Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space)
  - From: wschultz at bsdboy.com (Wil Schultz)
- Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space)
  - From: drc at virtualized.org (David Conrad)
- Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space)
  - From: wschultz at bsdboy.com (Wil Schultz)

Prev by Date: Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space)
Next by Date: Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space)
Previous by thread: Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space)
Next by thread: Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread