[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Do Not Complicate Routing Security with Voodoo Economics
- Subject: Do Not Complicate Routing Security with Voodoo Economics
- From: neil at domino.org (Neil J. McRae)
- Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2011 21:39:43 +0000
- In-reply-to: <CAJHGrrShOnb0Gn8sMbn_LBP2iFK+pRjGD4ZXB_64H==+N3HpFQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <m2mxek1v78.wl%[email protected]>, <CAJHGrrShOnb0Gn8sMbn_LBP2iFK+pRjGD4ZXB_64H==+N3HpFQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 4 Sep 2011, at 21:17, "Sharon Goldberg" <goldbe at cs.bu.edu> wrote:
thanks for responding you paper is interesting,
> Thus, while we cannot hope to accurately model every aspect of
> interdomain routing, nor predict how S*BGP deployment will proceed in
> practice, we believe that ISP competition over customer traffic is a
> significant economic lever for driving global S*BGP deployment.
If you cannot accurately model every aspect of interdomain routing - why is that? :)
Then how can you be sure that a single stock in this model can be so influential? "significant" I think one could almost argue the opposite also or make the same case about nearly any feature in a transit product! If i stop offering community based filtering- I'd probably see revenue decline!
Yes some features in a product set drive revenue - thats all you are really saying which is fine but we have alot of features people want in the network and what would be a more useful paper would be why this one might drive more revenue growth than the others that are all fighting development prioritisation - - - which isnt clear to me in your paper.
All this paper does is confuse (mislead?) people that SBGP might have a big pot of gold attached which is doubtful in my view (interdomain routing is very complex) and the point Randy made.
Neil