[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
NAT444 or ?
>> When you need to pile up this amount of trickery to make something
>> work, it's probably high time for letting the thing die :-)
> You could say the same thing about NAT44 from the very start!
many of us did
randy
- References:
- NAT444 or ?
- From: Jean-Francois.TremblayING at videotron.com (Jean-Francois.TremblayING at videotron.com)
- NAT444 or ?
- From: seth.mos at dds.nl (Seth Mos)
- NAT444 or ?
- From: davei at otd.com (David Israel)
- NAT444 or ?
- From: leigh.porter at ukbroadband.com (Leigh Porter)
- NAT444 or ?
- From: mike at mikejones.in (Mike Jones)
- NAT444 or ?
- From: carlosm3011 at gmail.com (Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo)
- NAT444 or ?
- From: leigh.porter at ukbroadband.com (Leigh Porter)