[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

CGN and CDN (was Re: what about the users re: NAT444 or ?)

Subject: CGN and CDN (was Re: what about the users re: NAT444 or ?)
From: rdobbins at arbor.net (Dobbins, Roland)
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 17:04:59 +0000
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <OF6F720EEF.5A0A7F90-ON85257906.00515568-85257906.005347E0@videotron.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Sep 9, 2011, at 11:06 PM, Alexander Harrowell wrote:

> Further, if making your hosting network IPv6 is hard, the answer is surely to give the job to a CDN operator with v6 clue.

This is a good strategy for payload-type content from unitary sources which lends itself to caching/redistribution; however, Web applications, things which link to/incorporate lots of content, etc. under the control of other organization, and 'active content' are another story, unfortunately.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins at arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>

		The basis of optimism is sheer terror.

			  -- Oscar Wilde

References:
- CGN and CDN (was Re: what about the users re: NAT444 or ?)
  - From: Jean-Francois.TremblayING at videotron.com (Jean-Francois.TremblayING at videotron.com)
- CGN and CDN (was Re: what about the users re: NAT444 or ?)
  - From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)
- CGN and CDN (was Re: what about the users re: NAT444 or ?)
  - From: a.harrowell at gmail.com (Alexander Harrowell)

Prev by Date: CGN and CDN (was Re: what about the users re: NAT444 or ?)
Next by Date: Pricing for Comcast Connectivity
Previous by thread: CGN and CDN (was Re: what about the users re: NAT444 or ?)
Next by thread: what about the users re: NAT444 or ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread