[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
ouch..
On 9/14/2011 10:41 AM, Leigh Porter wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 08:33 -0500, N. Max Pierson wrote:
>>> Either way, it's pathetic. If someone is going to slander in the
>>> fashion the site has done, they should at least put a contact form
>>> somewhere for some feedback :)
>> Slander means falsehood. Cisco tells lies ?
>>
>
> Lies? So who has 100G MX series cards then..?
>
That's disingenuous. The question was not whether Cisco has ever lied,
but whether the web page lies. The web page very carefully picks and
chooses facts, but I don't think it actually lies. Therefore, it isn't
slander. It's just mudslinging.
Also, on another note, nobody should be surprised that the registration
information doesn't say "Cisco." Think about it: would they want "whois
overpromisesunderdelivers.com" to say "Cisco" all over it?
- Follow-Ups:
- ouch..
- From: brandon.galbraith at gmail.com (Brandon Galbraith)
- References:
- ouch..
- From: maxsec at gmail.com (Martin Hepworth)
- ouch..
- From: nanog at rhemasound.org (Brian Raaen)
- ouch..
- From: geier at geier.ne.tz (Frank Habicht)
- ouch..
- From: ebais at a2b-internet.com (Erik Bais)
- ouch..
- From: chuckchurch at gmail.com (Chuck Church)
- ouch..
- From: saku at ytti.fi (Saku Ytti)
- ouch..
- From: nmaxpierson at gmail.com (N. Max Pierson)
- ouch..
- From: nanog at u61.u22.net (Always Learning)
- ouch..
- From: leigh.porter at ukbroadband.com (Leigh Porter)