[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Open Letters to Sixxs
- Subject: Open Letters to Sixxs
- From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)
- Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 15:58:10 -0400
- In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 15 Sep 2011 17:01:33 +0200." <4299CDD40A66466FADF8854A9765F913@work>
- References: <391A8D586FE94AB08C5E66B712BA4378@work> <[email protected]> <179E400888B9449E9393556CC09358CC@work> <CAAAas8GZuN2Hht8VSKTVRCeZ2pTT6sHwqhu+Xy0JgJ1LfSWGXA@mail.gmail.com> <4299CDD40A66466FADF8854A9765F913@work>
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 17:01:33 +0200, Meftah Tayeb said:
> Good thinking mike
> i do have a VoIp carrier single homed with Cogent.
> any solution?
Sure. Make sure you have alternate plans for when Cogent gets into another
peering tiff. Not *if*, but *when*. And you probably want to have a long,
detailed, technical discussion with your Voip carrier about what *they* intend
to do when Cogent gets into a peering tiff.
And while you're at it, see if you can find out what *other* surprises their
network design has in it - I'm willing to bet a large pizza with everything but
anchovies that "single homed with Cogent" is *not* the only massive deficiency
in their network - it's probably the equivalent of finding a brown M&M backstage
at a Van Halen concert...
(Yes, there's corner cases where "single homing to a Tier-1" makes business
sense, if the pipe is really cheap and you can survive the revenue hit caused
by a routing/peering spat. I don't think "VOIP carrier" is one of those corner
cases)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 227 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20110915/555175ce/attachment-0001.bin>