[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
BGP visibility for /24 End User Allocation
- Subject: BGP visibility for /24 End User Allocation
- From: david at davidswafford.com (David Swafford)
- Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 16:15:47 -0400
- In-reply-to: <730AF3879A3A3844B3FB5A881A3DFBC8D0EEC08A68@VA3DIAXVS091.RED001.local>
- References: <730AF3879A3A3844B3FB5A881A3DFBC8D0EEC08A68@VA3DIAXVS091.RED001.local>
Shouldn't be an issue. We're advertising 4 x \24s and using much more BW.
David.
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Eric Germann <egermann at limanews.com> wrote:
> Long time on-again-off-again lurker.
>
> Looking to multihome in the most efficient mode.
>
> Our two upstreams are AS11530 (Embarq) and AS10796 (Time Warner). ?Diverse routed fiber from each at 10Mbps.
>
> Our traffic profile is highly asymmetric as a consumer of bandwidth (12-15Mbps average inbound aggregate, 2-3Mbps aggregate very bursty outbound).
>
> Years ago when I tinkered with BGP there were substantial issues with getting any prefix too small through filters to see the "greater Internet" (IIRC it was a /19 at that time).
>
> Given we really could justify a /24 realistically, what is the current status of filtering in terms of having that /24 get to the "vast majority" of the Internet given the two providers in question?
>
> Thanks for any advice in advance.
>
> EKG
>
>