[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Real world sflow vs netflow?

Subject: Real world sflow vs netflow?
From: pl+list at pmacct.net (Paolo Lucente)
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 12:16:58 +0000
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <CAB8g2zzmCH8MMAMVum6i5WZFRxmXXApUvd5KD0-WZH1fXfdKbA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>

On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 10:30:25AM +0200, ?ukasz Bromirski wrote:

> NetFlow supports [ .. ] As well as L2 traffic (v9) [ .. ]

Let's be real and speak implementations: where is L2 information in
NetFlow for routed traffic on bigger platforms typically thrown for
peering at internet exchanges - ASR9K, C7600 (ie. hopefully without
get to invest more money in such platform to upgrade to Sup2T), MX,
CRS?

Cheers,
Paolo

PS: Let's not return on the point of availability of MAC accounting,
since that is not the solution.

References:
- Real world sflow vs netflow?
  - From: dhubbard at dino.hostasaurus.com (David Hubbard)
- Real world sflow vs netflow?
  - From: peter.phaal at gmail.com (Peter Phaal)
- Real world sflow vs netflow?
  - From: lukasz at bromirski.net (Łukasz Bromirski)

Prev by Date: using "reserved" IPv6 space
Next by Date: using "reserved" IPv6 space
Previous by thread: Real world sflow vs netflow?
Next by thread: Real world sflow vs netflow?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread