[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Another LTE network turns up as IPv4-only squat space + NAT

Subject: Another LTE network turns up as IPv4-only squat space + NAT
From: khomyakov.andrey at gmail.com (Andrey Khomyakov)
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 21:24:00 -0400
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <CAD6AjGQA4dn5m_1oQxdthy=41wCs1=UF6CtCDDC9FfbEFF1GWA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>

So some "comments" on the intertubes claim that DoD ok'd use of it's
unadvertized space on private networks. Is there any official reference
that may support this statement that anyone of you have seen out there?

--Andrey

Follow-Ups:
- Another LTE network turns up as IPv4-only squat space + NAT
  - From: trejrco at gmail.com (TJ)
- Another LTE network turns up as IPv4-only squat space + NAT
  - From: joelja at bogus.com (joel jaeggli)

References:
- Another LTE network turns up as IPv4-only squat space + NAT
  - From: cb.list6 at gmail.com (Cameron Byrne)
- Another LTE network turns up as IPv4-only squat space + NAT
  - From: streiner at cluebyfour.org (Justin M. Streiner)

Prev by Date: using "reserved" IPv6 space
Next by Date: Another LTE network turns up as IPv4-only squat space + NAT
Previous by thread: Another LTE network turns up as IPv4-only squat space + NAT
Next by thread: Another LTE network turns up as IPv4-only squat space + NAT
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread