[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

did AS174 and AS4134 de-peer?

Subject: did AS174 and AS4134 de-peer?
From: cowie at renesys.com (Jim Cowie)
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 17:34:44 -0500
In-reply-to: <AF24AE2D4A4D334FB9B667985E2AE76327BBF85D@mail1-sea.office.spectrumnet.us>
References: <AF24AE2D4A4D334FB9B667985E2AE76327BBF85D@mail1-sea.office.spectrumnet.us>

On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 2:23 AM, John van Oppen <jvanoppen at spectrumnet.us>wrote:

> All -
>
> I was noticing that it appears from our Seattle-based full route feed from
> cogent that they may have de-peered AS4134 (or vise-versa)...   anyone know
> anything about this?    We noticed this recently in a shift of traffic away
> from cogent for traffic to and from china telecom...   Now cogent's path is
> _174_1239_4134_.
>
>
Indeed:
http://www.renesys.com/blog/2012/03/cogent-depeers-china-telecom.shtml

cheers,   --jim

Follow-Ups:
- did AS174 and AS4134 de-peer?
  - From: gchalmers at gmail.com (Greg Chalmers)

References:
- did AS174 and AS4134 de-peer?
  - From: jvanoppen at spectrumnet.us (John van Oppen)

Prev by Date: Increase of DOS attacks using TCP src and/or dst of 0
Next by Date: Increase of DOS attacks using TCP src and/or dst of 0
Previous by thread: did AS174 and AS4134 de-peer?
Next by thread: did AS174 and AS4134 de-peer?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread