[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

filtering /48 is going to be necessary

Subject: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
From: leo.vegoda at icann.org (Leo Vegoda)
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 12:45:18 -0800
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <CAPWAtbJx56qyroisNYmB=0q8dDYMixfZBfQwDTVxmW=Y6mhP6w@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>

Owen wrote:

[...]

> In the ARIN region I think we have pretty well prevented this last issue
> with current policy. I tried to propose similar policy in the APNIC region,
> but it was not well accepted there. The folks in Asia seem t want to cling
> to their scarcity mentality in IPv6 for the time being. I believe RIPE is
> issuing reasonably generous IPv6 allocations/assignments. I don't
> know enough about the goings on in AfriNIC or LACNIC to comment
> with any certainty.

You can see the prefix distribution in charts that are updated daily on our stats web site:

http://stats.research.icann.org/

HTH,

Leo

References:
- filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: jsw at inconcepts.biz (Jeff Wheeler)
- filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)

Prev by Date: IPv6 routing table incomplete!
Next by Date: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
Previous by thread: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
Next by thread: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread