[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
Eugen Leitl wrote:
>> For high speed (fixed time) routed look up with 1M entries, SRAM is
>> cheap at /24 and is fine at /32 but expensive and power consuming
>> TCAM is required at /48.
>>
>> That's one reason why we should stay away from IPv6.
>
> What prevents you from using
> http://www.nature.com/ncomms/journal/v1/n6/full/ncomms1063.html
> with IPv6?
Though I didn't paid $32 to read the full paper, it's like
a proposal of geography based addressing.
So, I should ask what prevents you from using it with IPv4?
Masataka Ohta
- References:
- filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: joelja at bogus.com (Joel jaeggli)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: iljitsch at muada.com (Iljitsch van Beijnum)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: dougb at dougbarton.us (Doug Barton)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: rs at seastrom.com (Robert E. Seastrom)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: bicknell at ufp.org (Leo Bicknell)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: gih at apnic.net (Geoff Huston)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: gih at apnic.net (Geoff Huston)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (Masataka Ohta)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: eugen at leitl.org (Eugen Leitl)