[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Speedtest Results speedtest.net vs Mikrotik bandwidth test
On 3 Apr 2013, at 23:41, Warren Bailey <wbailey at satelliteintelligencegroup.com> wrote:
> They may do some magic with bandwidth delay products.. If that was the case, they may have written it for a standard latency versus something that is unreasonable by interweb standards.
I don't know how they calculate bandwidth, but I was surprised that their system gave such wrong results under what were effectively lab conditions.
Nick
>
>
> Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device
>
>
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Nick Hilliard <nick at foobar.org>
> Date: 04/03/2013 3:35 PM (GMT-08:00)
> To: Warren Bailey <wbailey at satelliteintelligencegroup.com>
> Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu,nanog at nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Speedtest Results speedtest.net vs Mikrotik bandwidth test
>
>
> On 3 Apr 2013, at 23:20, Warren Bailey <wbailey at satelliteintelligencegroup.com> wrote:
>> Try it with upwards of 900ms of variable latency.
>
> The last crazy result I got was 146mbit/s on a hardwired 100 mbit link and 1-2ms latency to the speedtest.net server I was using at the time (same data centre). Testing this sort of thing with high latency and jitter is understandably hard, but I didn't see a good reason at the time why it should have been so badly out with good underlying network characteristics.
>
> Nick
>
>
>
>>
>>
>> Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device
>>
>>
>>
>> -------- Original message --------
>> From: Nick Hilliard <nick at foobar.org>
>> Date: 04/03/2013 3:04 PM (GMT-08:00)
>> To: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu
>> Cc: nanog at nanog.org
>> Subject: Re: Speedtest Results speedtest.net vs Mikrotik bandwidth test
>>
>>
>> On 3 Apr 2013, at 22:48, Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu wrote:
>> > (If anybody's got evidence of it reporting more than the link is technically
>> > capable of, feel free to correct me...)
>>
>> I've seen speedtest.net give results significantly greater than the physical bw of the client's network link.
>>
>> Nick