[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

route for linx.net in Level3?

Subject: route for linx.net in Level3?
From: adam.vitkovsky at swan.sk (Adam Vitkovsky)
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 09:32:52 +0200
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <CAH1iCiriKczJcjZbirLhmdPqjqoJ_TO+UrQqeKwu1WjFYLa6YQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <m2k3oido1r.wl%[email protected]> <CAL89SgJDG77Ey2rRUKXYHbwY2Y4QfnucDhUrsqKrXnXXeH68+Q@mail.gmail.com> <m2fvz5eqoh.wl%[email protected]> <[email protected]>

> The older school of thought was to put all of the edge interfaces into the
IGP, and then carry all of the external routes in BGP. 
I thought people where doing it because IGP converged faster than iBGP and
in case of an external link failure the ingress PE was informed via IGP that
it has to find an alternate next-hop. 
Though now with the advent of BGP PIC this is not an argument anymore. 

adam

Follow-Ups:
- route for linx.net in Level3?
  - From: bicknell at ufp.org (Leo Bicknell)

References:
- route for linx.net in Level3?
  - From: brian.peter.dickson at gmail.com (Brian Dickson)
- route for linx.net in Level3?
  - From: jabley at hopcount.ca (Joe Abley)
- route for linx.net in Level3?
  - From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
- route for linx.net in Level3?
  - From: tom at cloudflare.com (Tom Paseka)
- route for linx.net in Level3?
  - From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
- route for linx.net in Level3?
  - From: bicknell at ufp.org (Leo Bicknell)

Prev by Date: Wells Fargo getting DDoSed ?
Next by Date: route for linx.net in Level3?
Previous by thread: route for linx.net in Level3?
Next by thread: route for linx.net in Level3?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread