[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Tier1 blackholing policy?
- Subject: Tier1 blackholing policy?
- From: patrick at ianai.net (Patrick W. Gilmore)
- Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 11:12:12 -0400
- In-reply-to: <1367334447.31455.5.camel@hounddog>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <1367334447.31455.5.camel@hounddog>
On Apr 30, 2013, at 11:07 , Chris Boyd <cboyd at gizmopartners.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 10:59 -0400, ML wrote:
>> 1) Do nothing - They're supposed deliver any and all bits
>> (Disregarding
>> a DoS or similiar situation which impedes said network)
>> 2) Prefix filter - Don't be a party (at least in one direction) to the
>> bad actors traffic.
>
> 3 - Deliver all packets unless I've signed up for an enhanced security
> offering?
While I like that plan, there are a LOT more people who will scream about not being "protected" than those who will bitch they can't get to a phishing site.
Since networks are for-profit companies, they'll lower their costs (e.g. support calls), as long as it lowers their cost more than the "cost" of losing a customer or two (and let's be honest, that is about all they _might_ lose) who are religious about the whole "transit means everywhere" thing.
--
TTFN,
patrick