[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Tier1 blackholing policy?
- Subject: Tier1 blackholing policy?
- From: schmid at dfn.de (Thomas Schmid)
- Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 17:23:50 +0200
- In-reply-to: <1367334447.31455.5.camel@hounddog>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <1367334447.31455.5.camel@hounddog>
On 30.04.2013 17:07, Chris Boyd wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 10:59 -0400, ML wrote:
>> 1) Do nothing - They're supposed deliver any and all bits
>> (Disregarding
>> a DoS or similiar situation which impedes said network)
>> 2) Prefix filter - Don't be a party (at least in one direction) to the
>> bad actors traffic.
>
> 3 - Deliver all packets unless I've signed up for an enhanced security
> offering?
>
right - I see this really as something that should be decided at the edge
of the internet (Tier2+) and not in the core.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4589 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20130430/8a62a74f/attachment.bin>