[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[nznog] Web Servers: Dual-homing or DNAT/Port Forwarding?

Subject: [nznog] Web Servers: Dual-homing or DNAT/Port Forwarding?
From: tim at pelican.org (Tim Franklin)
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 15:21:49 +0000 (GMT)
In-reply-to: <E308E99A91FF544B9DB12A15496C63143D186131@PACDCEXMB04.cable.comcast.com>
References: <zyXd1m00q1Una3W01yXfL2> <[email protected]> <E308E99A91FF544B9DB12A15496C63143D186131@PACDCEXMB04.cable.comcast.com>

> Just because something is public doesn?t mean you have to accept ALL
> traffic, it just means you have to anticipate any potential problems based
> on Larry knowing your address rather than imagining him standing at the
> front gate of your gated community. ;) (let?s torture that analogy!)

There's still a gated community?  I thought that particular piece of routing joy was long gone...

Sorry, I'll get my coat.
Tim.

References:
- [nznog] Web Servers: Dual-homing or DNAT/Port Forwarding?
  - From: LarrySheldon at cox.net (Larry Sheldon)
- [nznog] Web Servers: Dual-homing or DNAT/Port Forwarding?
  - From: Joshua_Sholes at cable.comcast.com (Sholes, Joshua)

Prev by Date: BRAS
Next by Date: turning on comcast v6
Previous by thread: [nznog] Web Servers: Dual-homing or DNAT/Port Forwarding?
Next by thread: [nznog] Web Servers: Dual-homing or DNAT/Port Forwarding?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread