[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
turning on comcast v6
- Subject: turning on comcast v6
- From: bicknell at ufp.org (Leo Bicknell)
- Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 09:43:56 -0600
- In-reply-to: <CAHd7N8PHgmeTKRE=exAWLHfWrcAi7=0ikO6fKBpRQBLFg9mOaA@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <m2haaihyer.wl%[email protected]> <m21u1jbk7u.wl%[email protected]> <CAHd7N8PHgmeTKRE=exAWLHfWrcAi7=0ikO6fKBpRQBLFg9mOaA@mail.gmail.com>
On Dec 11, 2013, at 9:11 AM, Eric Oosting <eric.oosting at gmail.com> wrote:
> It brings a tear to my eye that it takes:
>
> 1) specific, and potentially high end, CPE for the res;
> 2) specific and custom firmware, unsupported by CPE manufacturer ... or
> anyone;
I think this says more about Randy's specific choice/luck in hardware
than the general state of play. Unfortunately in low end CPE land
hardware ships with a specific set of software features, and generally
there is no (economic) model for the vendors to ever offer new features.
People don't buy "support" for low end CPE. The way to get new software
is to buy new hardware, which is really only a good solution when the
feature set required is stable over long periods of time.
There are plenty of low end residential style boxes that "just work"
with Comcast's setup out of the box with vendor images.
--
Leo Bicknell - bicknell at ufp.org - CCIE 3440
PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 793 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20131211/97bd6cfc/attachment.bin>