[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

.nyc - here we go...

Subject: .nyc - here we go...
From: fergdawgster at gmail.com (Paul Ferguson)
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 21:30:07 -0700
In-reply-to: <CAGFn2k0Y51AuGAeByN+gdY22X11Ojh+uNgibY5jyoH5ps0sNog@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[email protected]> <CAGFn2k32xi6xqdt2Ld2ivQ4vjm5m6mOkz3Soo_pXVQ+yzR24OA@mail.gmail.com> <CANQy6FbRwBn8U=4z__LCrsWrqbmepAY3Vy+NOdch_J3xufhFpw@mail.gmail.com> <CAGFn2k3ozDrDR-0VmYWMgnbxF8YC1RsXTFJ6khv46rb6sRVgQA@mail.gmail.com> <CANQy6FaDL2qwGr62T258-JJzsL3jMCxsyXP53jXUpbggL01Gaw@mail.gmail.com> <CAGFn2k0Y51AuGAeByN+gdY22X11Ojh+uNgibY5jyoH5ps0sNog@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Rubens Kuhl <rubensk at gmail.com> wrote:

> gTLDs operate under ICANN compliance regime and are required to abide by
> community policies. Will this be enough ? We don't know yet, but people have
> given some thought trying to find a way it is enough, and can require
> further mechanisms if the initial ones fail.
>

Of course, we all know that makes a huge difference.

Cheers,

- ferg




--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 fergdawgster(at)gmail.com

References:
- .nyc - here we go...
  - From: surfer at mauigateway.com (Scott Weeks)
- .nyc - here we go...
  - From: rubensk at gmail.com (Rubens Kuhl)
- .nyc - here we go...
  - From: fergdawgster at gmail.com (Paul Ferguson)
- .nyc - here we go...
  - From: rubensk at gmail.com (Rubens Kuhl)
- .nyc - here we go...
  - From: fergdawgster at gmail.com (Paul Ferguson)
- .nyc - here we go...
  - From: rubensk at gmail.com (Rubens Kuhl)

Prev by Date: .nyc - here we go...
Next by Date: .nyc - here we go...
Previous by thread: .nyc - here we go...
Next by thread: .nyc - here we go...
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread