[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

.nyc - here we go...

Subject: .nyc - here we go...
From: matthew at matthew.at (Matthew Kaufman)
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2013 15:48:54 -0700
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

Well, for starters there's whole truckloads of surplus gear that you can't  get for pennies and use successfully.

Matthew Kaufman

(Sent from my iPhone)

On Jul 4, 2013, at 11:11 AM, Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu wrote:

> On Thu, 04 Jul 2013 10:34:41 -0700, Eric Brunner-Williams said:
> 
>> #insert usual junk from *nog v6 evangelicals that .africa and .eos
>> (Basque Autonomous Region) must drive v6 adoption from their
>> ever-so-deep-pockets, or the net will die.
> 
> I'll bite.  What's the *actual* additional cost for dnssec and ipv6
> support for a greenfield rollout?  It's greenfield, so there's no
> "our older gear/software/admins need upgrading" issues.

Follow-Ups:
- .nyc - here we go...
  - From: marka at isc.org (Mark Andrews)

References:
- .nyc - here we go...
  - From: surfer at mauigateway.com (Scott Weeks)
- .nyc - here we go...
  - From: ml-nanog090304q at elcsplace.com (Ted Cooper)
- .nyc - here we go...
  - From: brunner at nic-naa.net (Eric Brunner-Williams)
- .nyc - here we go...
  - From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)

Prev by Date: .nyc - here we go...
Next by Date: .nyc - here we go...
Previous by thread: .nyc - here we go...
Next by thread: .nyc - here we go...
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread