[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Intermapper vs NetBrain vs some other for NMS
- Subject: Intermapper vs NetBrain vs some other for NMS
- From: thegameiam at yahoo.com (David Barak)
- Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 08:49:14 -0800
- In-reply-to: <CAOvEG7M6RUypWJx0DNBy6+=jR_8NA4p5o=1sed4NsbBad=c1AQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAOvEG7M6RUypWJx0DNBy6+=jR_8NA4p5o=1sed4NsbBad=c1AQ@mail.gmail.com>
I like intermapper for monitoring: it's been very stable, and exports traps and notifications well. I also like netbrain for troubleshooting and mapmaking, because its visualization is engineer and manager-friendly.
David Barak
Sent from a mobile device, please forgive autocorrection and top posting.
On Mar 8, 2013, at 8:38 AM, Ben Bartsch <uwcableguy at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all:
>
> I'm looking for information anyone might have comparing Intermapper to
> NetBrain for NMS. Stuff like devices up/down, interface utilization,
> building maps for documentation, etc. IMO, Intermapper works great, when
> it works. Tech support has been slow and often cannot fix the problems,
> not to mention they release updates about once every other week.
>
> Anyone familiar with any similar products? We are presently evaluating
> NetBrain and it seems really nice. We really like the Visio-like aspect of
> it.
>
> Thanks!
>
> -Ben