[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Network security on multiple levels (was Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat)
- Subject: Network security on multiple levels (was Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat)
- From: wbailey at satelliteintelligencegroup.com (Warren Bailey)
- Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 23:16:26 +0000
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
Contractors with facility clearances? I would find it hard to believe dot gov would run secure circuits to a non secure facility. ;)
>From my Android phone on T-Mobile. The first nationwide 4G network.
-------- Original message --------
From: Mike A <mikea at mikea.ath.cx>
Date: 03/12/2013 3:04 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: nanog at nanog.org
Subject: Re: Network security on multiple levels (was Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat)
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 04:41:42PM +0000, Warren Bailey wrote:
> Not to mention, the KG units are dot government only.. For obvious reasons.
Erm ... yesandno. Lots of defense contractors have one end of a secured
circuit. Been there, installed-and-maintained them.
--
Mike Andrews, W5EGO
mikea at mikea.ath.cx
Tired old sysadmin