[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Network security on multiple levels (was Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat)

Subject: Network security on multiple levels (was Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat)
From: jamie at photon.com (Jamie Bowden)
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 12:11:49 +0000
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

> From: Mike A [mailto:mikea at mikea.ath.cx]
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 04:41:42PM +0000, Warren Bailey wrote:
> > Not to mention, the KG units are dot government only.. For obvious
> reasons.

> Erm ... yesandno. Lots of defense contractors have one end of a secured
> circuit. Been there, installed-and-maintained them.

They don't belong to us, they're in a secured area inside a secured area (yes, I typed that twice on purpose), and they are regularly inspected by whichever bit of the fed loaned them to us.  It's in our facility only as long as the circuit it's servicing exists.

Jamie

References:
- Network security on multiple levels (was Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat)
  - From: mikea at mikea.ath.cx (Mike A)

Prev by Date: Network Configuration Management
Next by Date: Network security on multiple levels (was Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat)
Previous by thread: Network security on multiple levels (was Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat)
Next by thread: site that shows overview of current cyber attacks
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread