[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Reply-To:

Subject: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Reply-To:
From: nanog at haller.ws (Patrick)
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 21:53:22 +0800
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <CACg3zYGrBg43bN-LNUPQ384z7FFNtcPCB93B0QbYNn=_RU-EZA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On 2013-03-15 06:44, Owen DeLong wrote:
> Actually, it was "be conservative in what you send, liberal in what you accept."

Maybe you're thinking of another time/place, I was referring to:
	http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc761

References:
- WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work
  - From: jra at baylink.com (Jay Ashworth)
- WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work
  - From: oscar.vives at gmail.com ( .)
- WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work
  - From: nanog at haller.ws (Patrick)
- WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)

Prev by Date: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work
Next by Date: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work
Previous by thread: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work
Next by thread: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread