[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[c-nsp] DNS amplification

Subject: [c-nsp] DNS amplification
From: arturo.servin at gmail.com (Arturo Servin)
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 12:09:39 -0300
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <CAB_zYdLuMntEdyU=UJgz8saGyA_Cq2-Y-UrM5=XnOPmvJ9=X6w@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

Masataka,

	Do you have data to support your claim?

	I would said that poor BCP38 deployment it is because a lack of
economical incentive. I have only empirical data to support my claim
though (which is private conversations with ISPs not doing it and saying
that they do not see a cost effective advantage).

Regards,
as

On 3/18/13 12:02 PM, Masataka Ohta wrote:
> Current poor support for multihomed sites is a reason why
> BCP38 is not operational.

References:
- [c-nsp] DNS amplification
  - From: jlewis at lewis.org (Jon Lewis)
- [c-nsp] DNS amplification
  - From: arturo.servin at gmail.com (Arturo Servin)
- [c-nsp] DNS amplification
  - From: mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (Masataka Ohta)
- [c-nsp] DNS amplification
  - From: marka at isc.org (Mark Andrews)
- [c-nsp] DNS amplification
  - From: mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (Masataka Ohta)
- [c-nsp] DNS amplification
  - From: sander at steffann.nl (Sander Steffann)
- [c-nsp] DNS amplification
  - From: mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (Masataka Ohta)

Prev by Date: [c-nsp] DNS amplification
Next by Date: [c-nsp] DNS amplification
Previous by thread: [c-nsp] DNS amplification
Next by thread: [c-nsp] DNS amplification
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread