[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification]

Subject: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification]
From: sethm at rollernet.us (Seth Mattinen)
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 07:55:31 -0700
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <CAB_zYdLuMntEdyU=UJgz8saGyA_Cq2-Y-UrM5=XnOPmvJ9=X6w@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAO1bj=Zqvy+HbyEvLoyUgcvTn9BvmfoEXVfUfosPS3Aef4e34Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAL9jLabok0wUrYWN-CL2w_UEKJV4T+oGZTKDVWGkhAb=5qaEqQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <m2ip4mzkf3.wl%[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAO1bj=bu5GaenmyZm8UzD85H+_2Wa_2y8BOCHkcCGOQ0_-CT+w@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On 3/20/13 6:25 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>> I don't know a single ISP that wants to throttle growth by not accepting additional customers, BGP speaking or not. (I do know several that want to throttle growth through not upgrading their links because they have a captive audience they are trying to ransom. But that is neither relevant to this discussion, not controversial - unless you are paid by one of those ISPs?.)
> 
> Comcast
> Verizon
> AT&T
> Time Warner Cable
> Cox
> CenturyLink
> 
> to name a few.
> 
> Not one of them will run BGP with a residential subscriber.
> 

Based on the average clue of your average residential subscriber (anyone
here need not apply) I'd say that's a good thing.

~Seth

Follow-Ups:
- Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification]
  - From: jabley at hopcount.ca (Joe Abley)
- Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification]
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)

References:
- [c-nsp] DNS amplification
  - From: jlewis at lewis.org (Jon Lewis)
- [c-nsp] DNS amplification
  - From: arturo.servin at gmail.com (Arturo Servin)
- [c-nsp] DNS amplification
  - From: mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (Masataka Ohta)
- [c-nsp] DNS amplification
  - From: marka at isc.org (Mark Andrews)
- [c-nsp] DNS amplification
  - From: mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (Masataka Ohta)
- [c-nsp] DNS amplification
  - From: rdobbins at arbor.net (Dobbins, Roland)
- [c-nsp] DNS amplification
  - From: mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (Masataka Ohta)
- [c-nsp] DNS amplification
  - From: rdobbins at arbor.net (Dobbins, Roland)
- [c-nsp] DNS amplification
  - From: mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (Masataka Ohta)
- [c-nsp] DNS amplification
  - From: aledm at qix.co.uk (Aled Morris)
- [c-nsp] DNS amplification
  - From: morrowc.lists at gmail.com (Christopher Morrow)
- [c-nsp] DNS amplification
  - From: drc at virtualized.org (David Conrad)
- [c-nsp] DNS amplification
  - From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
- [c-nsp] DNS amplification
  - From: arturo.servin at gmail.com (Arturo Servin)
- [c-nsp] DNS amplification
  - From: aledm at qix.co.uk (Aled Morris)
- Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification]
  - From: patrick at ianai.net (Patrick W. Gilmore)
- Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification]
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)

Prev by Date: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification]
Next by Date: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification]
Previous by thread: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification]
Next by thread: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread